

It is Apple’s backdoor access that was the aberration, even for Apple. Jumping to the present, Sanchez debunks the notion that Apple or anyone else is setting an alarming new precedent with its encryption:
IS TSEARCH SAFE FREE
I'd add that you've long been free to buy a safe that opens only with your thumbprint, bury a treasure chest in a location known only to you, or write a diary in code. Today, you are free to lock up your e-mails, chats, or hard drives without providing the government with a spare key. was this: Would ordinary citizens be free to protect their communications and private files using strong, truly secure cryptography, or would governments seek to force programmers and computer makers to build in backdoors that would enable any scheme of encryption to be broken by the authorities? Happily for both global privacy and the burgeoning digital economy-which depends critically on strong encryption-the American government, at least, ultimately saw the folly of seeking to control this new technology. There were many distinct battlefields, but the overarching question. When the digital world was young, a motley group of technologists and privacy advocates fought what are now, somewhat melodramatically, known as the Crypto Wars. Comey has pressed this point on network television: The phone is the first one that thwarts intelligence and law enforcement agencies, like the National Security Agency, from gaining access to it, even if the authorities have court approval." (The iPhone 6 is not the first smartphone to offer default encryption.)Ĭomey's speech is part of a sustained effort to sway the debate over encryption, or what the FBI calls devices "going dark," thwarting efforts to solve robberies, kidnapping, and other crimes. "The speech was prompted, in part, by the new encryption technology on the iPhone 6, which was released last month. Comey will say that encryption technologies used on these devices, like the new iPhone, have become so sophisticated that crimes will go unsolved because law enforcement officers will not be able to get information from them," The New York Times reports. Hence the speech Comey is scheduled to give Thursday.

But technology companies are now selling devices that encrypt the user's data. Comey's ideal world, FBI agents would be able to access everything on a person's smartphone as long as a judge had issued a lawful warrant.
